Side effects and complications of intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia

  1. David Peñarrocha Oltra 3
  2. Francisco Javier Ata-Ali Mahmud 4
  3. María José Oltra Moscardó 1
  4. María Peñarrocha Diago 5
  5. Miguel Peñarrocha Diago 2
  1. 1 MD, DDS, PhD. Valencia University Medical and Dental School
  2. 2 Chairman of Oral Surgery. Director of the Master in Oral Surgery and Implantology. Valencia University Medical and Dental School. Valencia (Spain)
  3. 3 DDS, Resident of the Master in Oral Surgery and Implantology. Valencia University Medical and Dental School
  4. 4 DDS, Master in Oral Surgery and Medicine. Master in Oral Surgery and Implantology. Valencia University Medical and Dental School
  5. 5 Associate Professor of Oral Surgery. Valencia University Medical and Dental School
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa

ISSN: 1698-6946

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 17

Número: 3

Páginas: 22

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4317/MEDORAL.17512 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Objective: To analyze the side effects and complications following intraosseous anesthesia (IA), comparing them with those of the conventional oral anesthesia techniques. Material and method: A simple-blind, prospective clinical study was carried out. Each patient underwent two anesthetic techniques: conventional (local infiltration and locoregional anesthetic block) and intraosseous, for respective dental operations. In order to allow comparison of IA versus conventional anesthesia, the two operations were similar and affected the same two teeth in opposite quadrants. Heart rate was recorded in all cases before injection of the anesthetic solution and again 30 seconds after injection. The complications observed after anesthetic administration were recorded. Results: A total of 200 oral anesthetic procedures were carried out in 100 patients. Both IA and conventional anesthesia resulted in a significant increase in heart rate, though the increase was greater with the latter technique. Incidents were infrequent with either anesthetic technique, with no significant differences between them. Regarding the complications, there were significant differences in pain at the injection site, with more intense pain in the case of IA (x2=3.532, p=0.030, Φ2=0.02), while the limitation of oral aperture was more pronounced with conventional anesthesia (x2=5.128, p<0.05, Φ2=0.014). Post-anesthetic biting showed no significant differences (x2=4.082, p=0.121, Φ2=0.009). Conclusions: Both anesthetic techniques significantly increased heart rate, and IA caused comparatively more pain at the injection site, while limited oral aperture was more frequent with conventional anesthesia. Post-anesthetic biting showed no significant differences between the two techniques.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Sixou, JL, Barbosa-Rogier, ME. (2008). Efficacy of intraosseous injections of anesthetic in children and adolescents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 106. 173
  • Coggins, R, Reader, A, Nist, R, Beck, M, Meyers, WJ. (1996). Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection in maxillary and mandibular teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 81. 634
  • Dunbar, D, Reader, A, Nist, R, Beck, M, Meyers, WJ. (1996). Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection after an inferior alveolar nerve block. J Endod. 22. 481
  • Gallatin, J, Reader, A, Nusstein, J, Beck, M, Weaver, J. (2003). A comparison of two intraosseous anesthetic techniques in mandibular posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 134. 1476
  • Leonard, MS. (1995). The efficacy of an intraosseous injection system of delivering local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc. 126. 81
  • Nusstein, J, Reader, A, Nist, R, Beck, M, Meyers, WJ. (1998). Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 24. 487
  • Nusstein, J, Wood, M, Reader, A, Beck, M, Weaver, J. (2005). Comparison of the degree of pulpal anesthesia achieved with the intraosseous injection and infiltration injection using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Gen Dent. 53. 50
  • Parente, SA, Anderson, RW, Herman, WW, Kimbrough, WF, Weller, RN. (1998). Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection for teeth with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 24. 826
  • Prohić, S, Sulejmanagić, H, Secić, S. (2005). The efficacy of supplemental intraosseous anesthesia after insufficient mandibular block. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 5. 57-60
  • Reisman, D, Reader, A, Nist, R, Beck, M, Weaver, J. (1997). Anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 3% mepivacaine in irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 84. 676
  • Reitz, J, Reader, A, Nist, R, Beck, M, Meyers, WJ. (1998). Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection of 0.9 mL of 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) to augment an inferior alveolar nerve block. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 86. 516
  • Replogle, K, Reader, A, Nist, R, Beck, M, Weaver, J, Meyers, WJ. (1997). Anesthetic efficacy of the intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) and 3% mepivacaine in mandibular first molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 83. 30
  • Replogle, K, Reader, A, Nist, R, Beck, M, Weaver, J, Meyers, WJ. (1999). Cardiovascular effects of intraosseous injections of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 3 percent mepivacaine. J Am Dent Assoc. 130. 649
  • Chamberlain, TM, Davis, RD, Murchison, DF, Hansen, SR, Richardson, BW. (2000). Systemic effects of an intraosseous injection of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Gen Dent. 48. 299-302
  • Guglielmo, A, Reader, A, Nist, R, Beck, M, Weaver, J. (1999). Anesthetic efficacy and heart rate effects of the supplemental intraosseous injection of 2% mepivacaine with 1:20,000 levonordefrin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 87. 284
  • Stabile, P, Reader, A, Gallatin, E, Beck, M, Weaver, J. (2000). Anesthetic efficacy and heart rate effects of the intraosseous injection of 1.5% etidocaine (1:200,000 epinephrine) after an inferior alveolar nerve block. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 89. 407
  • Wood, M, Reader, A, Nusstein, J, Beck, M, Padgett, D, Weaver, J. (2005). Comparison of intraosseous and infiltration injections for venous lidocaine blood concentrations and heart rate changes after injection of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. J Endod. 31. 435
  • Bigby, J, Reader, A, Nusstein, J, Beck, M, Weaver, J. (2006). Articaine for supplemental intraosseous anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 32. 1044
  • Margaix-Muñoz, M, Jiménez-Soriano, Y, Poveda-Roda, R, Sarrión, G. (2008). Cardiovascular diseases in dental practice. Practical considerations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 13. 296-302
  • Gómez-Moreno, G, Guardia, J, Cutando, A, Calvo-Guirado, JL. (2009). Pharmacological interactions of vasoconstrictors. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 14. 20
  • Jensen, J, Nusstein, J, Drum, M, Reader, A, Beck, M. (2008). Anesthetic efficacy of a repeated intraosseous injection following a primary intraosseous injection. J Endod. 34. 126
  • Vasconcelos, BC, Freitas, K, Canuto, M. (2008). Frequency of positive aspirations in anesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve by the direct technique. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 13. 371
  • Rawson, RD, Orr DL, 2nd. (1985). Vascular penetration following intraligamental injection. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 43. 600
  • Gallatin, E, Stabile, P, Reader, A, Nist, R, Beck, M. (2000). Anesthetic efficacy and heart rate effects of the intraosseous injection of 3% mepivacaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 89. 83
  • Pipa-Vallejo, A, García-Pola-Vallejo, MJ. (2004). Local anesthetics in dentistry. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 9. 438
  • Silvestre, FJ, Salvador-Martínez, I, Bautista, D, Silvestre-Rangil, J. (2011). Clinical study of hemodynamic changes during extraction in controlled hypertensive patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 16. 354
  • Ezmek, B, Arslan, A, Delilbasi, C, Sencift, K. (2010). Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 18. 354
  • Liau, FL, Kok, SH, Lee, JJ, Kuo, RC, Hwang, CR, Yang, PJ. (2008). Cardiovascular influence of dental anxiety during local anesthesia for tooth extraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 105. 16-26
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet