What do adolescents say about bullying?

  1. Postigo Zegarra, Silvia Pilar 1
  2. Schoeps, Konstanze 2
  3. Ordonez, Ana 2
  4. Montoya-castilla, Inmaculada 2
  1. 1 Universidad Europea de Valencia.C/ General Elio, nº 2, 8 y 10. 46010 Valencia.Teléfono: (34) 96 104 38 80
  2. 2 Universidad de Valencia.
Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 35

Número: 2

Páginas: 251-258

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.35.2.301201 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de psicología

Resumen

Todos los actos antisociales, incluidos la violencia y el acoso escolar, lo son dentro de la colectividad en la que se producen y son un reflejo de esa colectividad. Este estudio se centra en el discurso espontáneo de 406 adolescentes entre 15 y 21 años sobre el acoso escolar. El análisis cualitativo de los datos permite inferir cuatro principios discursivos que se articulan desde la inicial negación de la violencia (“eso no pasa”), a la negación de la responsabilidad (“si pasa, no soy yo, somos todos”), la negación de la gravedad (“si es broma, no hace daño), y la atribución a la víctima (el acoso tiene más que ver con la víctima que con el agresor). El análisis del discurso espontáneo adolescente contribuye a definir su contexto interpretativo respecto a la violencia entre iguales. Incluir este conocimiento en el modelo científico es necesario para dar lugar a programas de intervención eficaces.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

This study is part of a larger research project that was approved by the Ethics Commission of the University of Valencia and complies with the ethical and moral principles established by the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association, 2013). With the permission of the Department of Education, Culture and Sport of the Valencian Community, schools that were interested in participating in the research were contacted. Prior to the evaluation, information meetings were held with school staff, and written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the participants who were minors and from the participants themselves if they were adults. Two expert psychologists collected the data during school hours. These experts explained the voluntary and anonymous nature of the study. The evaluation was carried out collectively in the classroom during one hour of class.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alonso-Tapia, J., & Rodríguez-Rey, R. (2012). Situaciones de interacción y metas sociales en la adolescencia: Desarrollo y validación inicial del cuestionario de metas sociales (CMS). Estudios de Psicología, 33(2), 191-206. doi: 10.1174/021093912800676484
  • Aluede, O., Adeleke, F., Omoike, D., & Afen-Akpaida, J. (2008). A review of the extent, nature, characteristics and effects of bullying behaviour in schools. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(2), 151–158.
  • Anderson, C. (2012). The Personal Sense of Power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313–344.
  • Burns, S., Maycock, B., Cross, D., & Brown, G. (2008). The power of peers: Why some students bully others to conform. Qualitative Health Research, 18(12), 1704-1716. doi: 10.1177/1049732308325865
  • Carrera, M. V., de Palma, R., & Lameiras, M. (2011). Toward a more comprehensive understanding of bullying in School settings. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 479-499. doi: 10.1007/s10648-011-9171-x
  • Cerezo, F. (2001). La violencia en las aulas: Análisis y propuestas de intervención. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century. En N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cheng, Y. Y., Chen, L. M., Ho, H. C., & Cheng, C. L. (2011). Definitions of school bullying in Taiwan: A comparison of multiple perspectives. School Psychology International, 32, 227-243. doi: 10.1177/0143034311404130
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
  • Compton, L., Campbell, M. A., & Mergler, A. (2014). Teacher, parent and student perceptions of the motives of cyberbullies. Social Psychology of Education, 17(3), 383–400. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9254-x
  • Crowther, S., Goodson, C., McGuire, J., & Dickson, J. M. (2013). Having to fight. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(1), 62-79. doi:10.1177/0886260512448846
  • Cuadrado-Gordillo, I. (2012). Repetition, power imbalance, and intentionality: Do these criteria conform to teenagers' perception of bullying? A role-based analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1889-1910. doi: 10.1177/0886260511431436
  • Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119(10), 1442–1452. http://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775
  • Davies, B. (2011). Bullies as guardians of the moral order or an ethic of truths? Children & Society, 25, 278-286. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00380.x
  • del Barrio, C.; Martín, E., Almeida, A., & Barrios, A. (2003). Del maltrato y otros conceptos relacionados con la agresión entre escolares, y su estudio psicológico. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 26(1), 9-24.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. (3a, Ed.). London,: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Femia-Marzo, P.; Martín-Andrés, A., & Álvarez-Hernández, M. (2012). El Modelo Delta para evaluar el grado de acuerdo entre dos observadores. Modelización de Fenómenos del Medio Ambiente, Salud y Desarrollo Humano, 1(1) 124-145.
  • Frisén, A., Holmqvist, K., & Oscarsson, D. (2008). 13-year-olds’ perception of bullying: Definitions, reasons for victimization and experience of adults’ response. Educational Studies, 34(2), 105-117. doi: 10.1080/03055690701811149
  • Forsberg, C., Wood, L., Smith, J., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Jungert, T., & Thornberg, R. (2016). Students’ views of factors affecting their bystander behaviors in response to school bullying: a cross-collaborative conceptual qualitative analysis. Research Papers in Education, 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1271001
  • Garaigordobil, M., & Martínez-Valderrey, V. (2016). Impact of cyberprogram 2.0 on different types of school violence and aggressiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(428). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00428
  • Garaigordobil, M., Martínez-Valderrey, V., & Machimbarrena, J. M. (2017). Intervención en el bullying y cyberbullying: Evaluación del caso Martín. Revista de Psicología Clínica Con Niños Y Adolescentes, 4(1), 25–32.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
  • Guerra, N. G., Williams, K. R., & Sadek, S. (2011). Understanding bullying and victimization during childhood and adolescence: A mixed methods study. Child Development, 82(1), 295–310. doi: 10.1111%2Fj.1467-8624.2010.01556.x
  • Hein, N. (2016). New perspectives on the positioning of parents in children’s bullying at school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1251305
  • Hopkins, L., Taylor, L., Bowen, E., & Wood, C. (2013). A qualitative study investigating adolescents’ understanding of aggression, bullying and violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(4), 685–693. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.01.012
  • Horton, P. (2011). School bullying and social and moral orders. Children & Society, 25, 268-277. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00377.x
  • Hymel, S., McClure, R., Miller, M., Shumka, E., & Trach, J. (2015). Addressing school bullying: Insights from theories of group processes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37(1), 16–24. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.008
  • Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70(4), 293–299. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0038928
  • Jara, N., Casas, J. A., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2017). Proactive and reactive aggressive behavior in bullying: The role of values. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(1), 1–24. http://doi.org/10.17583/IJEP.2017.2515
  • Lam, D. B., & Liu, A. W. H. (2007). The path through bullying –A process model from the inside story of bullies in Hong Kong secondary schools. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24(1), 53-75. doi: 10.1007/s10560-006-0058-5
  • Martín-Andrés, A., & Femia-Marzo, P. (2004). Delta: A new measure of agreement between two raters. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57(1), 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1348/000711004849268
  • Martín-Andrés, A. & Femia-Marzo, P. (2005). Chance-corrected measures of reliability and validity in K x K tables. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 14(5), 473–492. http://doi.org/10.1191/0962280205sm412oa
  • Martín, M., Martínez, J., & García-sánchez, R. (2017). Young people belonging to violent groups in the Region of Madrid . Psychosocial process model on the onset and evolution of violent identity behaviour. Anales de Psicología, 33(1), 120–132.
  • Mendoza-González, B., & Pedroza-Cabrera, F. J. (2015). Evaluación de un Programa de Intervención para Disminuir el Acoso Escolar y la Conducta Disruptiva. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 5(2), 1947–1959. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-4719(15)30015-6
  • Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61–72. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.007
  • Naylor, P., Cowie, H., Cossins, F., Bettencourt, R., & Lemme, F. (2006). Teachers’ and pupils’ definitions of bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 553-576. doi: 10.1348/000709905X52229
  • Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. London, UK: Hemisphere.
  • Olweus, D. (1999). Sweden. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 7–27). New York: Routledge.
  • Olweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some impor- tant questions. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Ortega, R. (2010). Agresividad Injustificada, Bullying y Violencia Escolar. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Patton, D. U., Eschmann, R. D., & Butler, D. A. (2013). Internet banging: New trends in social media, gang violence, masculinity and hip hop. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, A54–A59. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.035
  • Patton, D. U., Hong, J. S., Patel, S., & Kral, M. J. (2017). A Systematic Review of Research Strategies Used in Qualitative Studies on School Bullying and Victimization. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(1), 3–16. http://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015588502
  • Postigo, S., González, R., Montoya, I., & Ordóñez, A. (2013). Propuestas teóricas en la investigación del acoso escolar: Una revisión. Anales de Psicología, 29(2), 413-425. doi: 10.6018/analesps.29.2.148251
  • Rennie, D. L., Watson, K. D., & Monteiro, A. M. (2002). The rise of qualitative research in psychology. Canadian Psychology, 43(3), 179-189. doi: 10.1037%2Fh0086914
  • Rodkin, P. C., Espelage, D. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2015). A relational framework for understanding bullying: Developmental antecedents and outcomes. American Psychologist, 70(4), 311–321. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0038658
  • Ryan, A., & Morgan, M. (2011). Bullying in secondary schools: An analysis of discursive positioning. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 46(1), 23-34.
  • Ryan, W., & Smith, J. D. (2009). Antibullying Programs in Schools : How Effective are Evaluation Practices ? Prevention Science, 10(3), 248–259. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-009-0128-y
  • Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112-120. doi: 10.1016%2Fj.avb.2009.08.007
  • Sánchez, V., Ortega, R., & Menesini, E. (2012). La competencia emocional de agresores y víctimas de bullying. Anales de Psicología, 28(1), 71-82.
  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, P. K. (2013). School bullying. Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas, 71, 81–98. http://doi.org/10.7458/SPP2012702332
  • Smorti, A., Menesini, E., & Smith, P. (2003). Parents’ definitions of children’s bullying in a five-country comparison. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 417-432. doi: 10.1177%2F0022022103034004003
  • Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Tajfel, H. (1984). Grupos Humanos y Categorías Sociales [Human Groups and Social Categories]. Barcelona: Herder.
  • Ttofi, M. M., Bowes, L., Farrington, D. P., & Lösel, F. (2014). Protective Factors Interrupting the Continuity From School Bullying to Later Internalizing and Externalizing Problems: A Systematic Review of Prospective Longitudinal Studies. Journal of School Violence, 13(1), 5–38. http://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2013.857345
  • Twining, P., Heller, R. S., Nussbaum, M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies. Computers & Education, 106, A1–A9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002
  • Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Krygsman, A.,
  • Miller, J., Stiver, K., & Davis, C. (2008). Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 486-495. doi: 10.1177/0165025408095553
  • Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The role of teachers in bullying: The relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1135–1143. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0036110
  • Volk, A. A., Farrell, A. H., Franklin, P., Mularczyk, K. P., & Provenzano, D. A. (2016). Adolescent Bullying in Schools: An Evolutionary Perspective. In D. C. Geary & D. B. Berch (Eds.), Evolutionary Perspectives on Child Development and Education, Evolutionary Psychology (pp. 167–191). Cham: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29986-0
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wang, C., Ryoo, J. H., Swearer, S. M., Turner, R., &
  • Goldberg, T. S. (2017). Longitudinal Relationships between Bullying and Moral Disengagement among Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 1304–1317. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0577-0
  • Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2010). El estudio experimental del poder social: Consecuencias cognitivas, afectivas y comportamentales. Estudios de Psicología, 31(3), 279-295. doi: 10.1174/021093910793154402
  • Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del Rey, R. (2015). Scientific research on bullying and cyberbullying: Where have we been and where are we going. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 188–198. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.015
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet