El rompecabezas de las preferencias sociales

  1. Brandts Bernad, Jordi
  2. Fatás Juberías, Enrique
Revista:
Revista internacional de sociología

ISSN: 0034-9712

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 70

Número: 1

Páginas: 113-126

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Revista internacional de sociología

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, S., Goeree, J., and Holt, C. 1998. “A theoretical analysis of altruism and decision error in public goods games.” Journal of Public Economics 70:297-323.
  • Andreoni, J. 1995. “Cooperation in public-goods experiments: kindness or confusion?.” American Economic Review 85:891-904.
  • Andreoni, J. 1988. “Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments.” Journal of Public Economics 37:291-304.
  • Bochet, O., Page, T., and Putterman, L. 2006. “Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 60:11–26.
  • Blount, S. 1995. “When social outcomes aren’t fair: the effect of causal attributions on preferences.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63:131-144.
  • Bolton, G.E, and Ockenfels, A. 2000. “ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition.” American Economic Review, 90:166-193.
  • Brandts, J., Saijo, T., and Schram, A. 2004. “How universal is behavior? A four country comparison of spite, cooperation and errors in voluntary contribution mechanisms.” Public Choice, 119:381-424.
  • Burlando, R., and Guala, F. 2005. “Heterogeneous agents in public goods experiments.” Experimental Economics, 8:35-54.
  • Cabrera, S., Fatas, E., Lacomba, J.A., and Neugebauer, T. 2010. “Vertically splitting a firm: promotion and relegation in a team production experiment.” Discussion Papers on Economic Behavior, University of Valencia.
  • Camerer, C. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic Interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Cameron, L. A. 1999. “Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia.” Economic Inquiry 27:47-59.
  • Charness, G., and Rabin M. 2002. “Understanding social preferences with simple tests.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117:817-869.
  • Charness, G., and Yang, C. 2007. “Endogenous group formation and public goods provision: exclusion, exit, mergers and redemption.” Working paper, Department of Economics, University of CaliforniaSanta Barbara. Available. at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=932251.
  • Chaudhuri, A. 2009. Experiments in Economics: Playing Fair with Money. London: Routledge.
  • Chaudhuri, A. (2010). “Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature.” Experimental Economics 14 (1):47-83.
  • Chaudhuri, A., and Paichayontvijit, T. 2006. “Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to a public good.” Economics Bulletin 3:1-14.
  • Cinyabuguma, M., Page, T., and Putterman, L. 2006. “Cooperation under the threat of expulsion in a public goods experiment.” Journal of Public Economics 89:1421-1435.
  • Cooper, D.J. and Kagel J.H. 2010. “Other regarding preferences: a selective survey of experimental results.” in the Handbook of Experimental Economics Vol 2, edited by J.H. Kagel and A. Roth, Princeton University Press.
  • Cox, J., Friedman, D., and Gjerstad, S. 2007. “A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness.” Games and Economic Behavior 59:17-45
  • Cox J., Friedman, D., and Sadiraj, V. 2008. “Revealed altruism.” Econometrica 76:31-69.
  • Croson, R., Fatas. E., and Neugebauer, T. 2006. “Excludability and contribution: a laboratory study in team production.” Mimeo: Wharton School of Economics.
  • Dawes, R., McTavish, J. and Shaklee, H. 1977. “Behavior, communication and assumption about other people’s behavior in common dilemma situations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psycology 35:1-11.
  • Dufwenberg, M., and Kirchsteiger, G. 2004. “A theory of sequential reciprocity.” Games and Economic Behavior 47:268-298.
  • Eckel, C., Fatas, E., and Wilson, R. 2010. “Cooperation and status in organizations.” Journal of Public Economic Theory 12(4):737-762.
  • Ehrhart, K.-M., and Keser, C. 1999. “Cooperation and mobility: on the run.” Working paper, CIRANO and University of Karlsruhe.
  • Falk, A., and Fischbacher, U. 2006. “A theory of reciprocity.” Games and Economic Behavior 54:293-315.
  • Fatas, E., Melendez-Jiménez. M. A., and Solaz, H. 2010a. “Punishment, Cooperation and Networks.” Discussion Papers on Economic Behavior: University of Valencia.
  • Fatas, E., Meléndez-Jiménez, M. A., Morales, A., and Solaz, H. 2010b. “Public goods and decays in networks.” Discussion Papers on Economic Behavior: University of Valencia.
  • Fatas, E., Morales, A. and Úbeda, P. 2010c. “Blind justice: an experimental analysis of random punishment in team production.” Journal of Economic Psychology 31:358-373.
  • Fehr, E., and Fischbacher, U. 2002. “Why social preferences matter. The impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation, and incentives.” The Economic Journal 112, C1-C33.
  • Fehr, E., and Gächter, S. 2000. “Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments.” American Economic Review, 90:980-994.
  • Fehr, E., and Schmidt, K. 1999. ‘’A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation.’’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817-868.
  • Fehr, E., and Schmidt, K. 2006. “The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism-experimental evidence and new theories.” Pp. 615-91 in Handbook on the economics of giving, reciprocity and altruism, vol. 1, S.-C. Kolm and J. Mercier Ythier (Comp.), Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Fischbacher, U., Gächter. S., and Fehr, E. 2001. “Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment.” Economics Letters 71:397-404.
  • Fischbacher, U., and Gächter, S. 2009. “On the behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments.” Discussion Paper No. 2009-25, Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, University of Nottingham.
  • Fischbacher, U., and Gächter, S. 2010. “Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public good experiments.” American Economic Review 100:541-556.
  • Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J., Savin, N., and Sefton, M. 1994. “Fairness in simple bargaining Experiments.” Games and Economic Behavior 6:347-369.
  • Gächter, S. 2007. “Conditional cooperation. Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications.” Pp.19-50 in Economics and psychology. A promising new cross-disciplinary field. edited by B. Frey and A. Stutzer (Comp), CESifo Seminar Series. Cambridge Mas.: MIT Press.
  • Gächter, S., and Thöni, C. 2005. “Social learning and voluntary cooperation among like-minded people.” Journal of the European Economic Association 3:303-314.
  • Guillén, P., Fatas, E., and Brañas-Garza, P. 2010. “Inducing efficient conditional cooperation patterns in public goods games. An experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology 31(6): 872-883.
  • Gunnthorsdottir, A., Houser, D., and McCabe, K. 2007. “Disposition, history and contributions in public goods experiments.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 62:304-315.
  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., and Schwarze, B. 1982. “An experimental analysis of ultimatum Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3:367-388.
  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., and Fehr, E. 2001. “In search of homo economicus: experiments in 15 small-scale societies.” American Economic Review 91: 73-79.
  • Hermann, B., and Thöni, C. 2008. “Measuring conditional cooperation: a replication study in Russia.” Experimental Economics 12:87-92.
  • Hermann, B., Thöni, C., and Gächter, S. 2008. “Antisocial punishments across societies.” Science 319:1362-1367.
  • Isaac, M., and Walker, J. 1988. “Communication and free riding behavior: the voluntary contributions mechanism.” Economic Inquiry 26:585-608.
  • Kagel, J., and Roth, A. 1995. Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Keser, C., and van Winden, F. 2000. “Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 102:23-39.
  • Kocher, M., Cherry, T., Kroll, S., Netzer, R., and Sutter, M. 2008. “Conditional cooperation on three continents.” Economics Letters 101:175-178.
  • Kurzban, R., and Houser, D. 2005. An experimental investigation of cooperative types in human groups: a complement to evolutionary theory and simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102:1803:1807.
  • Ledyard, J. 1995. “Public goods: some experimental results.” Pp.111-194 in Handbook of Experimental Economics, edited by J. Kagel and A. Roth, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Nikiforakis, N. 2008. “Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: can we really govern ourselves?.” Journal of Public Economics 92:91-112.
  • Nikiforakis, N., and Normann, H. 2008. “A comparative statics analysis of punishment in public good experiments.” Experimental Economics 11:358-369.
  • Offerman, T., Sonnemans, J., and Schram, A. 1996. “Value orientations, expectations and voluntary contributions in public goods.” The Economic Journal 106:817-845.
  • Oleveira, A., Croson, R., and Eckel, C. 2009. “One bad apple: uncertainty and heterogeneity in public good provision.” Mimeo: University of Texas at Dallas.
  • Ostrom, E., Walker, J., and Gardner, R. 1992. “Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible.” American Political Science Review 86:404-417.
  • Page, T., Putterman, L., and Unel, B. 2005. “Voluntary association in public goods experiments: reciprocity, mimicry, and efficiency.” The Economic Journal 115:1032-053.
  • Palfrey, T. and Prisbrey, J. 1997. “Anomalous behavior in linear public goods experiments: how much and why?.” American Economic Review 87:829-846.
  • Rabin, M. 1993. “Incorporating fairness into economics and game theory.” American Economic Review 83:1281-1302.
  • Rotemberg, J. 2006. “Altruism, reciprocity and cooperation in the workplace.” Pp. 1371-1407 in Handbook on the economics of giving, reciprocity and altruism vol. 2, edited by Serge-Christophe Kolm and Jean Mercier Ythier. North Holland.
  • Sonnemans, J., Schram, A., and Offerman, T. 1999. “Strategic behavior in public good games: when partners drift apart.” Economics Letters 62:35-41.
  • Slonim, R., and Roth, A. 1998. “Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: an experiment in the slovak republic”, Econometrica 66:569-596.
  • Vesterlund, L. 2012. “Public goods experiments.” In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol 2, edited by J. Kagel and A. Roth, forthcoming.
  • Yamagishi, T. 1986. “The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:110-116.
  • Yamagishi, T. 1988. “The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan.” Social Psychology Quarterly 51:265–271.