Disidencias contraacadémicas desde las vanguardias y el docente de artes del s. XXI

  1. Rocío Silleras Aguilar
Journal:
Ausart aldizkaria: arte ikerkuntzarako aldizkaria = journal for research in art = revista para la investigación en arte

ISSN: 2340-8510 2340-9134

Year of publication: 2018

Issue Title: Disidencia y Sistema/Sistema y disidencia ¿Es todavía posible hoy una crítica al sistema desde las prácticas artísticas?

Volume: 6

Issue: 2

Pages: 137-151

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1387/AUSART.20340 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Ausart aldizkaria: arte ikerkuntzarako aldizkaria = journal for research in art = revista para la investigación en arte

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

This article points to the self-taught person as a classical academic dissident of all times and areas, either officially learned or not and the great benefits that this traditional subversive agent brings to art, knowledge, education and even academia. It exposes its important value for the education of the XXI century where the information and communication technologies, the Do It Yourself, the collaborative work and the creative commons licences have generated a change from educational and cultural verticality to horizontality. At the same time it shows numerous artistic antecedents of this democratization, the change of axes that would take place in all the spheres of life and of these counter-academic practices. And analyzes the 'school' of the 21st century, the role of student and that of the teacher of arts today, when it acquires special relevance.

Bibliographic References

  • Burroughs, William Seward. (1970) 2005. The electronic revolution. New York: UBU. https://www.swissinstitute.net/2001-2006/Images/electronic_revolution.pdf
  • Foucault, Michel. (1966) 2007. Las palabras y las cosas: Una arqueología de las ciencias humanas. Traducción de Elsa Cecilia Frost. Madrid: Siglo XXI
  • Foucault, Michel. (1969) 2009. La arqueología del saber. Traducción de Aurelio Garzón del Camino. Madrid: Siglo XXI
  • Harris, David. 2016. “The need for more pi-shaped science artists”. Clot Magazine, 10 ago. http://www.clotmag.com/pi-shaped
  • Howarth, Sophie. (2000) 2015. “Marcel Duchamp: Fountain 1917, replica 1964”. Tate.org. Revised by Jennifer Mundy. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/duchamp-fountain-t07573
  • Lawson, Dorie McCullough. (2004) 2008. Posterity: Letters of great Americans to their children. New York: Anchor
  • Libedinsky, Juana. 2017. “Duchamp, la fuente y el inodoro de oro”. La Nación, 29 ene. https://www.lanacion.com.ar/1979357-duchamp-la-fuente-y-el-inodoro-de-oro
  • López de Benito, Ramón. 2016. “Picasso: Esculturas en papel para un nuevo pensamiento estético.” Boletín de Arte [UMA Dpto. Hª Arte] 37: 129-38
  • Matamoros Ocaña, Elena & Alfredo Aracil Ávila. 2013. “Cage 101.” Por la Danza 98: 84-9. http://www.alfredoaracil.info/docs/writings/Cage101PorlaDanza.pdf
  • Mora Suárez-Varela, Vicente Luis. 2015. ”Arte y tachado”. Diario de lecturas, blog personal, 28 abril. http://vicenteluismora.blogspot.com/2015/04/arte-y-tachado.html