Study with surface electromyography, borg scale and rom upper trapezius, deltoid of the three portions (clavicular, acromial, spinal) and the latissimus dorsi muscle, before and after using a muscle activation technique (mat)

  1. Esther Blasco Herráiz 1
  2. Vicente Lizondo 1
  3. Luís Berbel Ferrer
  4. Julio Martín Ruiz 1
  1. 1 Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
    info

    Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03d7a9c68

Revue:
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise: JHSE

ISSN: 1988-5202

Année de publication: 2016

Volumen: 11

Número: 2

Pages: 329-337

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14198/JHSE.2016.112.06 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

D'autres publications dans: Journal of Human Sport and Exercise: JHSE

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

The patologies located at shoulder can be caused by misuse or continued implementation of a sporting practice or physical activity. These pathplogies are second position in the ranking of Traumatologics and Orthopedic Clinicals. Shoulder's muscle injuries can occur when the arm is in a position that exceeds normal, this fact is repeated in sport, may be the repetition of the hand signal of the inductor problem. Given the importance of muscle function of the shoulder joint, along the existing boom of the new techniques in the specific muscle activation has been carried out an experimental study using a "Test Neuro Propioceptive Response" with other scientific techniques (EMG, Borg Scale and ROM), wich will provide us information about the activation of the upper trapezius, acromial, scapular, spine, latissimus dorsi. This study has five professional volunteered women specialist of Physical Activity, wich to analyze them, their muscle activation. The results show that all the muscles analyzed shows significant improvement (p<.05) in mean muscle activation recorded with electromiography in the dominant arm, after activation with muscle activation technique employed. These results, although with such a small sample denote the analytical techniques that improve muscle activation.

Références bibliographiques

  • 1. Sobotta, J. (2000), Atlas of Human Anatomy. Elsevier Science Publishing. New York
  • 2. Myers, J., & Lephart, S. (2000.) The Role of the Sensorymotor System in the Athletic Shoulder. J Athl Train 35(3), 351-363.
  • 3. Myers, J., & Oyama, S. (2008). Sensorimotor factors affecting outcome following shoulder injury. Clin Sports Med 27, 481-490.
  • 4. Stevens, A., & Lowe, J. (1999). Histologie Humaine. Elsevier Science Publishing: New York.
  • 5. Kapandji, A. I. (2006). The Physiology of the joint. Volume Three (trunk and Vertebral Colum). Churchill Livingstone.
  • 6. Schünke, M., Schulte, E., Schumacher, U., & Wesker, K. (2006). Prometheus: Panamericana.
  • 7. Basmajian, J.V. & De Luca C.J. (1985). Muscles Alive. Their functions revealed by electromyography. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
  • 8. Cram, J.R., Kasman, G.S., & Holtz, J. (1998). Introduction to surface electromyography. Gaithersburg: Aspen publishers.
  • 9. Kimura, J. (1983). Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
  • 10. Delagi, E. & Perotto, A. (1981). Anatomic guide for the electromyographer. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
  • 11. Balestra, G., Frassinelli, S., Knaflitz, M., & Molinari, F. (2001). TimeFrequency analysis of surface myoelectric signals during athletic movement. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 20(6), 106115.
  • 12. Potvin, J.R., & Bent, L.R. (1997). A validation of techniques using surface EMG signals from dynamic contractions to quantify muscle fatigue during repetitive tasks. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 7(2), 131-139.
  • 13. Cramer, J.T., Housh, T.J., Weir, J.P., Johnson, G.O., Ebersole, K.T., Perry, S.R., & Bull. A.J. (2002). Power output, mechanomyographic, and electromyographic responses to maximal, concentric, isokinetic muscle actions in men and women. J. Strength Cond Res, 16(3), 399-408.
  • 14. Rowe, C. R. (1974) Adult re-evaluation of the position of the arm in arthrodesis of the shoulder in the adult. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 56-A, 913-922.
  • 15. Norkine & White (2006). Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide of Goniometry. F.A. Davis Company. Marbán: Spain.
  • 16. Coquart, J. B., Tourny Chollet, C., Lemaitre, F., Lemaire, C., Grosbois, J. M., & Garcin, M. (2012). Relevance of the measure of perceived exertion for the rehabilitation of obeses patients. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 55(9-10), 623-640.
  • 17. Matoulek, M. (2007). Defining the level of physical activity for a diabetic who is obese. Vnitrní Lékarství, 53(5), 560-562.
  • 18. Mäestu, J., & Jürimae, T. (2005). Monitoring performance and training and rowing. Sports Medicine, 35(7), 597-617.
  • 19. Gerlach, Y., Williams, M. T., & Coates, A. M. (2012). Weighing up the evidence a systematic review of measures used for the sensation of breathlessness in obesity. International Journal of obesity, 37(3), 341-349.
  • 20. Borg, E. & Kaijser, L. (2006). A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 16(1), 57-69.
  • 21. Borg, G. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived. J.Med.Sci.Sports Exercise, 14(5), 377-381.
  • 22. Cram, J.R. (2005). Cram´s introduction to Surface Electromyography. Jones and Bartlett Publishers: Sudbury, Massachusetts.
  • 23. Clarys, J.P. & Cabri, J. (1993). Electromyography and the study of sports movements: a review. J. Sports Sci, 11(5), 379-448.
La source de données: Dialnet