Robustez en las redes de gobernanza colaborativa e implicaciones para la conservación del paisaje en el Mosaico do Espinhaço, Brasil

  1. Burgos, Andrés 1
  2. Mertens, Frédéric 2
  1. 1 Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Universidade de Brasília
  2. 2 Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Revista:
Redes: Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales

ISSN: 1579-0185

Año de publicación: 2024

Título del ejemplar: Gobernanza, coaliciones y políticas regionales

Volumen: 35

Número: 1

Páginas: 1-25

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5565/REV/REDES.1000 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Redes: Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The article analyzes the structural properties and robustness of a collaborative governance network (n= 230) that operates in a large-scale conservation initiative in Brazil to test the maintenance of network functions over time. We explore the network robustness after random eliminations and targeted removals, and which simulate socio-environmental changes in this conservation initiative. Our analysis, also supported by longitudinal empirical data on actor turnover, indicates that the governance network is highly robust to tests carried out, since it is unlikely that reasonable levels of exit of actors would cause a significant fragmentation of the network. However, the network is more vulnerable to removals of the most central actors and those especially important in natural resource management than to the random elimination of part of its members, indicating the prominence of these actors in the network articulation and governance process maintenance. The methodological procedures used in this study can help identify potential governance networks vulnerabilities to different disturbances and support long-term and landscape-scale conservation plans.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000). Error & attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406, 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1038/35019019
  • Alexander, S. M., Andrachuk, M., & Armitage, D. (2016). Navigating governance networks for community-based Conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1251
  • Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2004). A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society, 9(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00610-090118
  • Baggio, J. A, BurnSilver, S. B., Arenas, A., Magdanz, J. S., Kofinasd, G. P., & Domenico, M. D. (2016). Multiplex social ecological network analysis reveals how social changes affect community robustness more than resource depletion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(48), 13708-13713. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160440111
  • Barabási, A.-L. (2014). Network Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beilin, R., Reichelt, N. T., King, B. J., Long, A., & Cam, S. (2013). Transition landscapes and social networks: examining on-ground community resilience and its implications for policy settings in multiscalar systems. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05360-180230
  • Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1692-1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
  • Bixler, R. P., Johnson, S., Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., Reuling, M., Curtin, C. et al. (2016). Networks and landscapes: a framework for setting goals and evaluating performance at the large landscape scale. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1250
  • Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. (2008). Management of Natural Resources at the Community Level: Exploring the Role of Social Capital and Leadership in a Rural Fishing Community. World Development, 36(12), 2763-2779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.12.002
  • Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance. What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19, 366-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
  • Bodin, Ö., Crona, B., & Ernstson, H. (2017). Las redes sociales en la gestión de los recursos naturales: ¿Qué hay que aprender de una perspectiva estructural? Redes. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 28(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.684
  • Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw: Graph Visualization Software. Needham, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  • Borrini-Feyerabend, G., & Hill, R. (2015). Governance for the conservation of nature. In G. L. Worboys, M. Lockwood, A. Kothari, S.
  • Feary & I. Pulsford (Eds.), Protected area governance and management (pp. 169-206). Camberra: ANU Press.
  • Burgos, A., & Mertens, F. (2017). Participatory management of community-based tourism: A network perspective. Community Development, 48(4), 546-565. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2017.1344996
  • Burgos, A., & Mertens, F. (2022). Collaborative governance networks: exploring governance success in large-scale conservation. Ambiente & Sociedade, 25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20220110L5OA
  • Carlsson, L. G., & Sandström, A. C. (2008). Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 33-54. http://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.20
  • Cumming, G. S. (2017). A Review of Social Dilemmas and Social-Ecological Traps in Conservation and Natural Resource Management. Conservation Letters, 00(0), 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12376
  • Dezső, Z., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Halting viruses in scale-free networks. Physical Review Journals, 65(5), 055103(R). http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.055103
  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., &. Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441-473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
  • Groce, J. E., Farrelly, M. A., Jorgensen, B. S., & Cook, C. N. (2019). Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 33(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13127
  • Guerrero, A. M., McAllister, R. R. J., & Wilson, K. A. (2015). Achieving Cross-Scale Collaboration for Large Scale Conservation Initiatives. Conservation Letters, 8(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12112
  • Guerrero, A. M., Barnes, M., Bodin, Ö., Chadès, I., Davis, K. J., Iftekhar, M. S. et al. (2020). Key considerations and challenges in the application of social‐network research for environmental decision making. Conservation Biology, 34(3), 733-742. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13461
  • Hanneman, R. A., Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California.
  • IBGE. (2022). Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática – SIDRA. Consulta [23/11/2022] http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/
  • ICMBio. (2022). Unidades nos Biomas. Consulta [23/11/2022] https://www.gov.br/icmbio/pt-br/assuntos/biodiversidade/unidade-de-conservacao/unidades-de-biomas
  • IEF. (2022). Unidades de Conservação. Consulta [23/11/2022] http://www.ief.mg.gov.br/unidades-de-conservacao
  • Kark, S., Tulloch, A., Gordon, A., Mazor, T., Bunnefeld, N., & Levin, N. (2015). Cross-boundary collaboration: key to the conservation puzzle. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COSUST.2014.08.005
  • Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., & Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1):19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01606-110119
  • Lindenmayer, D., & Burgman, M. (2005). Practical Conservation Biology. Clayton, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
  • Lockwood, M. (2010). Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(3), 754-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.005
  • Mardones, G. (2017). Análisis de redes sociales para la gobernanza de un área protegida y su zona de amortiguación en el bosque templado del sur de Chile. Redes. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 28(1), 61-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/redes.690
  • Mathevet, R., Thompson, J. D., Folke, C., & Chapin, F. S. (2016). Protected areas and their surrounding territory: social-ecological systems in the context of ecological solidarity. Ecological Applications, 26, 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0421
  • McKinney, M., Scarlett, L., & Kemmis, D. (2010). Large landscape conservation: a strategic framework for policy and action. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
  • Mertens, F., Saint-Charles, J., Luccote, M., & Mergler, D. (2008). Emergence and robustness of a community discussion network on mercury contamination and health in the Brazilian Amazon. Health Education & Behavior, 35(4), 509-521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198108320357
  • Mertens, F., Távora, R., Fonseca, I. F., Grando, R., Castro, M., & Demeda, K. (2011). Redes sociais, capital social e governança ambiental no Território Portal da Amazônia. Acta Amazônica, 41(4), 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0044-59672011000400006
  • Mertens, F., Fillion, M., Saint-Charles, J., Mongeau, P., Távora, R., Passos, C. J., & Mergler, D. (2015). The role of strong-tie social networks in mediating food security of fish resources by a traditional riverine community in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecology and Society, 20(3), 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07483-200318
  • Mittermeier, R. A., Gil, P. R., Hoffman, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mittermeier, C. G. et al. (2005). Hotspots revisited: earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • MMA. (2000). Lei nº 9.985 de 18 de julho de 2000. Regulamenta o art. 225 parágrafo 1º, incisos I, II, III, e IV da Constituição Federal, institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação - SNUC. Brasília: MMA. Consulta [23/11/2022] https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9985.htm
  • MMA. (2010). Portaria 444 de 26 de novembro de 2010. Reconhece o Mosaico de unidades de conservação do Espinhaço: Alto Jequitinhonha – Serra do Cabral. Brasília: MMA. Consulta [23/11/2022] http://www.ibama.gov.br/sophia/cnia/legislacao/MMA/PT0444-261110.PDF
  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853-858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
  • Olson, M. (2001). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  • RBRB. (2022). Reserva da Biosfera da Serra do Espinhaço. Consulta [23/11/2022] https://reservasdabiosfera.org.br/a-rbrb/
  • Scarlett, L., & McKinney, M. (2016). Connecting people and places: the emerging role of network governance in large landscape conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1247
  • Scott, J. (2000). Social Network Analysis. A Handbook. London, UK: Sage Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529716597
  • SEGRH. (2022). Bacia hidrográfica do Rio Jequitinhonha. Consulta [23/11/2022] http://www.igam.mg.gov.br/component/content/160?task=view
  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1999). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
  • Webb, C., & Bodin, Ö. (2008). A network perspective on modularity and control of flow in robust systems. In J. Norberg, & G. S. Cumming. (Eds.), Complexity theory for a sustainable future (pp. 85-118). New York: Columbia Press.
  • Worboys, G. L., Francis, W. L., & Lockwood, M. (2010). Connectivity Conservation Management: A global guide. London: Earthscan.
  • Worboys, G. L., Lockwood, M., Kothari, A., Feary, S., & Pulsford, I. (Eds.). (2015). Protected Area Governance and Management. Canberra: ANU Press.
  • Wyborn, R., & Bixler, P. (2013). Collaboration and nested environmental governance: Scale dependency, scale framing, and cross-scale interactions in collaborative conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, 123, 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.014
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet